🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume atomic discussions with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had come from go-betweens to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is navigating a complex course since Iran wishes not to be seen to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that ended with the US president declaring the facilities had been destroyed. Afterward, European countries employed their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Offered

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the talks that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Present Status

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be revived in certain ways if discussions reopen.

The US president last week claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to restart talks, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of international law, Araghchi declared the 12-day war demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He stated the assaults commenced with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust hard to restore.

Negotiations Remains the Final Resolution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently sought to dictate their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and continues the final solution to address conflicts, but its requirements, rules and principles must be respected."

"In case they address to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a reply in the identical tone."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have grown more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the nation in the face of this attack."